Benitez v. Arpaio et al
Plaintiff: |
Sergio Cortez Benitez |
Defendant: |
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department |
Case Number: |
2:2012cv00560 |
Filed: |
March 16, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Office: |
Phoenix Division Office |
County: |
Maricopa |
Presiding Judge: |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert C Broomfield |
Nature of Suit: |
Prison Condition |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 21, 2013 |
Filing
38
ORDER, the Court declines to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status for the appeal, re: 13-16926 37 USCA Referral Notice, 35 Notice of Appeal. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/21/13. (REW)
|
August 21, 2013 |
Filing
33
ORDER, the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendant Maricopa County's Motion to Dismiss 27 ; Defendant Maricopa County's Motion to Dismiss 27 is granted; Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion; the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/21/13. (REW)
|
March 19, 2013 |
Filing
21
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments of Remaining Balance of Inmate Filing Fee be made from Prison Account of Sergio Cortez Benitez. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/17/13. (REW)
|
November 15, 2012 |
Filing
13
ORDER (Service Packet), Plaintiff's constitutional claims for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right to medical care and equal protection are dismissed without prejudice 12 ; Defendant Maricopa County must answer Plaintiff's claim for violation of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act 12 ; the Clerk must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended Complaint 12 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Maricopa County; Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk within 21 days; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/15/12. (REW)
|
August 8, 2012 |
Filing
11
ORDER that Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Extension of Time is granted to the extent that Plaintiff has an additional 45 days from the filing date of this Order in which to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the July 9, 2012, 9 O rder. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/8/2012.(LFIG)
|
July 9, 2012 |
Filing
9
ORDER, the First Amended Complaint 7 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to file comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 7/7/12. (REW)
|
June 7, 2012 |
Filing
8
AMENDED ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Segio Cortez Benitez. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 6/7/12. (REW)
|
April 27, 2012 |
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Sergio Cortez Benitez. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/26/12. (REW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?