Honeywell International Incorporated v. Western Support Group Incorporated et al
| Honeywell International Incorporated |
| Western Support Group Incorporated, Douglas C Harmon and Cynthia A Harmon |
| 2:2012cv00645 |
| March 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Copyrights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER denying 73 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney without prejudice. The motion is not in compliance with LRCiv 83.3(b)(2). ORDERED granting 73 Motion to Vacate June 26, 2013 Hearing. The Hearing re: discovery dispute set for 6/26/2013 at 1:3 0 P.M. is hereby vacated. If no motion to withdraw is filed within 3 days of this Order, Plaintiff may seek to reset a discovery dispute as set forth in the Court's Rule 16 Scheduling Order. (see attached Order for details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/2013.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 52 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 54 Motion for Protective Order. ORDER amending the Rule 16 Scheduling Order 26 . Discovery due by 8/1/13 and dispositive motions due by 8/30/13 (see order for complete information). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/29/13.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 34 Western Support's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/4/13.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
