Klungvedt v. Unum Group et al
| David N Klungvedt |
| Unum Group and Paul Revere Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2012cv00651 |
| March 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John W Sedwick |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 2/13/13.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER AND OPINION, Defendants' motion to amend its answer 36 is granted, and the proposed amended answer at docket 36-1, which admits that ERISA is inapplicable, may be filed; Plaintiff's motion 40 is granted in part and denied in part; his request for summary judgment in his favor on the issue of ERISA's inapplicability is granted, but his request for sanctions against defendants' counsel is denied. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/31/12.(REW)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion in Limine; denying 33 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/31/12.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER re 7 Motion to Expedite; 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; 12 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's motion at docket 7 for a speedy hearing on his claim for declaratory relief is GRANTED as follows: 1) The parties shall have 60 days from the date of this order to engage in factual discovery on the issue of whether ERISA applies to the insurance plan in question. 2) At the close of the 60-day period of limited discovery, either party may file a properly supported motion f or summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the question of whether ERISA applies and therefore preempts plaintiff's state law claims. Defendants' motion at docket 11 for judgment on the pleadings, construed in part as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is DENIED. Defendants' motion to strike at docket 12 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 6/21/12. (JWS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
