Medley v. Ryan et al
| Laura L Medley |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2012cv00762 |
| April 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David K Duncan |
| G Murray Snow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Bade's 13 Report and Recommendation is accepted. Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. The Clerk shall terminate this action. In the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/8/2013. (LFIG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/27/2012. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
