Dyson Technology Limited et al v. Cornucopia Products LLC
| Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson Incorporated |
| Cornucopia Products LLC |
| 2:2012cv00924 |
| May 2, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Neil V Wake |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Cornucopia Products LLC. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX 0970-6718742. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O. Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 12-00924-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dyson Incorporated, Dyson Technology Limited (submitted by William Maledon). (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Dyson Incorporated, Dyson Technology Limited (submitted by William Maledon). (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-6718742, filed by Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson Incorporated (submitted by William Maledon). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
