Davis et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
| Ronald Davis and Araceli Davis |
| Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Home Retention Services Incorporated |
| 2:2012cv01059 |
| May 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Neil V Wake |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER that the 19 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Verified Complaint by Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, is granted. That the First Amended Verified Complaint (Doc. 16) is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Bank of America Corporation. That Counts One, Two, Three, Five, Six, and Seven of the First Amended Verified Complaint (Doc. 16) are dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant B ank of America, N.A., individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP. That Count Four of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 16) is dismissed as to Defendant Bank of America, N.A., individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, to the extent that it seeks punitive damages or damages for non-economic injuries. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 11/28/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER that the 10 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP is GRANTED as to Counts One, Two, Three, Five, Six, and Seven of the Ve rified Complaint against Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., GRANTED as to Count Four of the Verified Complaint against Defendant Bank of America Corporation, and DENIED as to Count Four of the Verified Complaint again st Defendant Bank of America, N.A. That Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint by September 21, 2012. That Plaintiffs show cause by September 21, 2012, why their complaint against Defendant Home Retention Services, Inc., not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 8/22/12.(DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
