Barclay v. Medicine Show Land Trust et al
| William Barclay |
| Medicine Show Land Trust, James G Redcloud, Elizabeth Durham, E B Chester and Unknown Chester |
| 2:2012cv01060 |
| May 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER, dismissing Counts 1, 7, and 8 of the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); denying Defendants' First Motion for Summary Judgment on All Causes of Action 45 ; granting in part Barclay's Cross-motion for Part ial Summary Judgment that the Waiver is void as against public policy with respect to Counts 2, 3, 4, and 5 58 ; denying in part Barclay's Cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment in all other respects; denying as moot Chester's Motion for Summary Judgment 75 , because Chester was dismissed as a party by stipulation 105 . Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 2/19/14. (REW)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER, pursuant to the Parties' 104 Stipulation/Joint Motion to Dismiss this Action with Prejudice as to Defendants E.B. Chester and Jane Doe Chester (the "Chester Defendants"), dismissing with prejudice any and all claims against the Chester Defendants with all parties to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/10/13.(REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
