Ruelas et al v. Sun American Mortgage Company et al
| Angelica D Ruelas and Ralph A Ruelas |
| Sun American Mortgage Company, Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2005-111, Federal National Mortgage Association, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Security Title Agency, Unknown Parties and Bank of America NA |
| 2:2012cv01160 |
| May 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER, granting Defendant Sun American Mortgage Company's 29 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $6,818.82; the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant Sun American Mortgage Company against Plaintiffs Ralph A Ruelas and Angelica D Ruelas fka Angelica D Nehrling, jointly and severally, in the amount of $6,818.82, plus interest at the federal judgment interest rate from the date of judgment until paid. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 11/26/12. (REW)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that the 9 and 12 Motions to Dismiss are granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint by 8/31/2012. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case without further order if Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 8/8/2012.(LFIG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
