Robledo v. Ryan et al
Paul Anthony Robledo |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2012cv01281 |
June 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Mark E Aspey |
James A Teilborg |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Supplement, (Doc. 64 ), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Ruling, (Doc. 63 ), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Relief from the Court's Order, (Doc. 56 ), and the Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, (Doc. 59 ), are DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/19/18. (MAW) |
Filing 51 ORDER, the motion to alter or amend judgment 39 is denied; the motion for status 49 is denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/12/13.(REW) |
Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, the 31 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted; the objections are overruled; the Petition is dismissed with prejudice, because it is barred by the statute of limitations and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly; Petitioner's 13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied; Petitioner's 24 Motion for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability is denied for the reasons stated above. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/31/13. (REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.