Beltran-Ojeda v. Unknown Parties et al
Saul Beltran-Ojeda |
Unknown Parties and Joseph M Arpaio |
2:2012cv01287 |
June 15, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Mark E Aspey (PS) |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Reconsideration and the motion is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/18/2014.(LFIG) |
Filing 29 ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (a) the Motion is granted as to Count I, and Co unt I is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and (b) the Motion is denied as to Count II. Arpaio is dismissed as a Defendant. The remaining claim is Count II against Dr. Friedman. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/18/2013. (LFIG) |
Filing 23 ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice. Within 10 days from the date of this Order, Defendants must file either an Answer or new motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/17/2013.(LFIG) |
Filing 11 ORDER (Service Packet): ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in Count Two regarding medical testing and medical appointments, as well as his claims against Defendant Arpaio in Count Two, are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Doe is dismissed wi thout prejudice. Defendant Arpaio must answer Count One of the Second Amended Complaint and Defendant Friedman must answer Plaintiff's hepatitis C claims in Count Two. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the 10 Second Amended Complaint, this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Arpaio and Friedman. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/18/2013. (LFIG) |
Filing 9 ORDER, the First Amended Complaint 7 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/30/12. (REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.