Parks v. Ryan et al
| Edward F Parks |
| Janice K Brewer and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2012cv01350 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| David K Duncan (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER, Plaintiff's Motion to Pre[s]ent Account 6 mo Print-Out 6 is granted; Plaintiff's second Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 8 is denied; Plaintiff's Complaint 1 and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursu ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); if Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he must prepay the entire $350.00 filing fee when he files his action; Plaintiff's Motion to Show Medical Violations 7 is denied as moot; the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/4/12. (REW)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; within 30 days, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/9/12. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
