Franchise Holding II LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Group Incorporated et al
| Franchise Holding II LLC |
| Huntington Restaurants Group Incorporated, Golden Management Incorporated, Richard Beattie and Michelle Beattie |
| 2:2012cv01363 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David K Duncan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER granting 89 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/24/2014.(DGC, nvo)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 72 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff will be awarded damages in the amount of $12,800,000, with prejudgment interest at ten percent per annum. Plaintiff shall lodge a proposed form of judgment with the Court on or before January 15, 2014. See PDF document for details. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/8/14.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 33 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 2/20/2013. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/13/2013.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/1/2012.(NVO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
