Lindley v. Ryan et al
| Robert F Lindley, Jr. |
| Bruce J McMorran, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Truog and John Kinton |
| 2:2012cv01422 |
| July 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER (Service Packet) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 8 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an init ial partial filing fee of $8.22. Count Two is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Truog is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Ryan, McMorran, and Kinton must answer Count One. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet incl uding the Complaint (Doc. 1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Ryan, McMorran, and Kinton. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of th is Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/22/2013. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
