Juniel v. Labcorp
| Joyce Juniel |
| Labcorp |
| 2:2012cv01539 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER pursuant to 67 Plaintiff's request to dismiss her case and 68 Stipulation to Dismiss: IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion requesting referral to preliminary medical expert (Doc. 60 ) is found to be moot. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/6/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER - 1. Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 21 , 24 ) are granted. The HIPPA claim is dismissed with prejudice, and the other claims are dismissed without prejudice as discussed above. 2. Plaintiff's motion for written responses in stead of oral argument or delay of oral argument (Doc. 25 ) is denied as moot. 3. Plaintiff's motion to remove or sever Anasazi (Doc. 26 ) is granted. 4. Plaintiff's motion to delay any immediate dismissal (Doc. 34 ) is denied. 5. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Anasazi is dismissed without prejudice. 6. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as to Defendant Labcorp on or before June 14, 2013. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/24/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER - 1. Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 21 , 24 ) are granted. The HIPPA claim is dismissed with prejudice, and the other claims are dismissed without prejudice as discussed above. 2. Plaintiff's motion for written responses in stead of oral argument or delay of oral argument (Doc. 25 ) is denied as moot. 3. Plaintiff's motion to remove or sever Anasazi (Doc. 26 ) is granted. 4. Plaintiff's motion to delay any immediate dismissal (Doc. 34 ) is denied. 5. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Anasazi is dismissed with prejudice. 6. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as to Defendant Labcorp on or before June 14, 2013. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/17/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 11) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's emergency motions preventing Defendants from terminating her as a patient (Docs. 10, 12) are denied. 3. Plaintiff's complaint(s) are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a single amended complaint on or before January 4, 2013. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/14/12.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Juniel v. Labcorp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Labcorp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joyce Juniel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
