Cheeks v. General Dynamics et al
| Loretta H Cheeks |
| General Dynamics C4 Systems Incorporated and General Dynamics Corporation |
| 2:2012cv01543 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
184
ORDER denying 179 Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for New Trial. See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/23/2015.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike GDC4S' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 113 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 110 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED awarding Defendant, GDC4S $24,720.00 in attorneys' fees from Plaintiff, Ms. Cheeks. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/28/2014.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER that consistent with the above, Plaintiff Loretta Cheek's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 85 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consistent with the above, Defendants General Dynamics Corporation and General Dynamics C4 Syst ems Incorporated's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. With respect to Defendant General Dynamics Corporation, summary judgment is granted on Counts Two, Three, and Seven. With respect to Defendant Gene ral Dynamics C4 Systems Incorporated, summary judgment is granted on Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and the Counterclaim. Summary judgment is denied on Count Seven. FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties are directed to confer in good faith to re solve any disputes concerning the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs related to GDC4S's Counterclaim for Breach of Contract. See L.R. Civ. 54.2(d)(1). If the Parties are unable to agree, GDC4S may file a motion pursuant to Local Rule 54.2. Any such motion shall be filed, with a supporting memorandum, on or before June 27, 2014, with the response and reply briefs due in accordance with the time periods provided in Local Rule 54.2(b)(3) and (4). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant General Dynamics shall be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/19/2014.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order and File Amended Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Fourth Amended Complaint (currently lodged at Doc. 44-1) within 5 days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED amending the Scheduling Order (Doc. 27) solely as follows: All discovery must be completed by 11/1/2013. All dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 12/9/2013. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/24/2013.(TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
