Creamer v. Ryan et al
Matthew Ronald Creamer |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2012cv01781 |
August 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pima |
Susan R Bolton |
Mark E Aspey |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 30 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the order of this Court; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice; denying any Certificate of Appe alability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 1/30/14. (REW) |
Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The District Court must "issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to th e applicant." IT IS FURTHER recommended that, should the Report and Recommendation be adopted and, should Petitioner seek a certificate of appealability, a certificate of appealability should be denied because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 1/3/14. (LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.