Cleveland v. Pinal County Superior Court et al
| Christopher Lamar Cleveland |
| Paula M Cook, Pinal County Superior Court, State Bar of Arizona and Jason R Holmberg |
| 2:2012cv01942 |
| September 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Steven P Logan (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 2 .) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial fili ng fee of $17.06. The Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff's motion s for appointment of counsel and to submit addresses to theU.S. Marshal are denied as moot. (Doc. 6 , 7 .) The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike&quo t; under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/16/2012. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
