Vanity.com Incorporated v. Vanity Shop of Grand Forks Incorporated
| Vanity.com Incorporated |
| Vanity Shop of Grand Forks Incorporated |
| 2:2012cv02120 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vanity.com Incorporated v. Vanity Shop of Grand Forks Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vanity.com Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Erin D Vivion |
| Represented By: | Michael L Rodenbaugh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vanity Shop of Grand Forks Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Brian William LaCorte |
| Represented By: | Teri T Pham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
