Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Gonzalez et al
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Delman Gabilo and Yaily Gonzalez |
2:2012cv02235 |
October 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frederick J Martone |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER the Clerk of the Court is to accept the $27,000.00 basic life insurance coverage (the "Life Benefits") decedent Ariel Gonzalez was entitled to as participant in the Starwood Hotels Life and Accidental Death Benefit Plan (the &quo t;Plan"). MetLife is dismissed with prejudice from this action and MetLife, Starwood, and the Plan are discharged from any further liability upon payment of the Life Benefits. MetLife is awarded its costs of $404.49 and attorney's fees of $3,352.80 incurred in this action. We deny MetLife's request that these fees be paid from the interpleaded fund. ORDER GRANTING fees and costs in the total amount of $3,757.29 in favor of MetLife and against defendant Gonzalez. ORD ER that the Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment in favor of defendant Gabilo and against defendant Gonzalez. The Clerk is FURTHER ORDERED to disburse the Life Benefits ($27,000.00) to defendant Gabilo at the address listed on the docket re granting 19 (please see attached order for complete information). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 5/21/13.(TLJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.