Larson v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
| Christy Larson |
| Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest and Gallagher Bassett Services Incorporated |
| 2:2012cv02356 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 108 ). FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 116 ). As a matter of law, neither Defendants' initial denial and investigation nor continued denial to obtain medical records constituted bad faith. FURTHER ORDERED setting the following briefing schedule for a renewed, limited motion for summary judgment as to whether Defendants' conduct between accepting La rson's claim to medical benefits and accepting it to disability benefits constituted bad faith and supports putting punitive damages to a jury: Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment: 07/17/14; Plaintiff's Response: 07/31/14; Defendants' Reply: 08/07/14. If no such briefing is filed, Larson may submit this limited conduct to a jury and go forward with her claims for compensatory and punitive damages as to that conduct only. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/3/14. (NKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
