Smith v. Chandler, City of et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 20, 2016
ORDER re: 74 USCA Mandate. A review of the docket shows that at the time summary judgment was granted 55 , all deadlines had passed except for the proposed pretrial order, the final pretrial conference and the firm trial date. Discovery had close d in December 2013. Accordingly, all that is left in this case is the trial. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/25/2016. Jury Trial set for 11/14/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 401, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Fre derick J Martone. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/3/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 401, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Frederick J Martone. See attached order. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/20/2016. (LMR)
|March 2, 2015
ORDER granting 71 Motion Requiring Cost Bond on Appeal. Plaintiff shall submit a check in the amount of $250.00 to the Clerk of the Court within seven (7) days of this order. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/27/2015.(LMR)
|November 25, 2014
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs and awarding defendants $125,466.50 in fees and $34,891.75 in non-taxable costs. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 11/25/2014.(LMR)
|April 16, 2014
ORDER granting defendants' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED denying defendants' 50 Motion to Strike. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/16/2014.(LFIG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?