Acushnet Company v. Thiede, et al.
| Acushnet Company |
| Unknown Parties, Thomas Allan Thiede and Dualwin Sporting Goods Compay Limited |
| 2:2012cv02508 |
| November 26, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Release/Exonerate Bond. The bond posted on December 6, 2012 is exonerated. The Clerk shall issue a check payable to Osborn Maledon for the $10,000 bond, including all accrued interest. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/3/14.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 40 Plaintiff's Application for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on Defendant Dualwin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/27/13.(MAW)
|
|
Filing
39
SEALED ORDER granting Application for Preliminary Injunction FURTHER ORDERED denying 32 Sealed Motion. Instead, the seal on the entirety of this case is hereby removed, and the Clerk is instructed to return this file to the public portion of the Court records. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/8/13. (cc: Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant) (MAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
