Medrano v. Ryan et al
||Camillo Castillo Medrano, III
||Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
||November 28, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Mark E Aspey
||G Murray Snow
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 21, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 : IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action and enter judgment according ly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/21/13. (LAD)
|January 15, 2013
ORDER granting 2 Petitioner's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certif ied mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/15/13. (DMT)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?