Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Eagle Mechanical Insulation LLC
| Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund |
| Eagle Mechanical Insulation LLC |
| Wells Fargo Bank |
| 2:2012mc00096 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER AAND JUDGMENT AGAINST GARNISHEE (NON-EARNINGS) - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has judgment against Garnishee in the amount of $4,516.37. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garnishee has judgment against Defendant in the amount of 6;100.00 for reasonable compensation for answering the Writ, to be paid from the garnished funds pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1591(b). IT IS ORDERED: 1. Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan's R & R (Doc. 8) is accepted, and Plaintiff's orig inal Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non-Earnings (Doc. 6) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's second Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non- Earnings (Doc. 15) is granted. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff against Garnishee in the amount of $4,516.37 and judgment for Garnishee against Defendant in the amount of $100.00. The Clerk shall then terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/28/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
