Bass v. Correctional Health Services et al
| Johann Alexander Bass |
| C Lillie, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party, Inmate Legal Services, Correctional Health Services and J Baumann |
| 2:2013cv00009 |
| January 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER: The magistrate judge shall issue a Scheduling Order no later than February 14, 2014. Defendant CH 904 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As to Defendant Maricopa County, Counts One and Two are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As to Defendant Alvarez, Count Two is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Answers to the First Amended Complaint are required as follows: (1) as to Count One, from Defendants Cranmer, Friedman, Gaskins, Johnson, and Alvarez; (2) as to Count Two, from Defendants Johnson a nd Gaskins; and (3) as to Count Three, from Defendants Johnson, Gaskins, and Maricopa County. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including both summons and request for waiver forms for these Defendants. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/30/2014. (LFIG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
