Westfield Insurance Company v. Double AA Builders Limited
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Double AA Builders Limited
Case Number:
2:2013cv00012
Filed:
January 3, 2013
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
August 12, 2013 | 13 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Westfield Insurance Company v. Double AA Builders Limited | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Westfield Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Thomas Harold Crouch |
Represented By: | Wyatt Matthew Bailey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Double AA Builders Limited | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.