Colletti v. Arpaio et al
| Salvatori Joseph Colletti |
| Unknown Alger, Unknown Garcia, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Jade, Unknown Harmon, Unknown Paval and G Millard |
| 2:2013cv00222 |
| February 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Steven P Logan (PS) |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER Defendants Paval and Garcia are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants A6542 and Alger must answer the First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7 ), this Orde r, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants A6542 and Alger. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan pursuant toRules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/23/2013. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Salvatori Joseph Colletti. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/10/2013. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
