Schiller et al v. Rite of Passage Incorporated
| Jeffery Schiller, Tyrice Roderick and Michael Frantz |
| Rite of Passage Incorporated |
| 2:2013cv00576 |
| March 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| H Russel Holland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER re Defendant's 186 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's motion is granted as to plaintiffs' FLSA overtime claims and the Named plaintif fs' AWA claims. Defendant's motion is also granted as to Frantz's and Washington's FLSA retaliation claims except for the claims based on allegations that they were called into work less frequently after they became plaintiffs in this matter. Defendant's motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 08/18/15. (ATD)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER - The named plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification of a collective action of current and former coach counselors who worked at Canyon State Academy between March 20, 2010 and the present who were required to sleep or stay on the premises overnight without pay 54 is granted. Defendant shall produce a list of all current and former coach counselors meeting the class definition within ten days of the entry of this order. The parties shall submit a jointly revised propos ed notice on or before March 4, 2014. If the parties cannot agree as to the notice, they may request a telephonic conference with the court. Defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply 59 is denied. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 2/18/14. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 55 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and defendant's request for an award of monetary sanctions against Poirier is granted in the amount of $1,180.75. Poirier shall appear for deposition during merits discovery if defendan t notices such deposition. Poirier is informed that any failure to comply with this court's order to appear for his deposition during merits discovery will result in immediate dismissal of his claims. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 2/14/14.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
