Haldiman et al v. Continental Casualty Company

Plaintiff: Betty Lou Haldiman and John B Haldiman, Jr.
Defendant: Continental Casualty Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv00736
Filed: April 11, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 13, 2014 60 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Continental Casualty Company's ("CCC") Motion for a Protective Order (Doc. 39 ) and Motion to Dismiss Counts Three and Five of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. 33 ) are GR ANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conduct of discovery shall be governed by the following parameters: 1. Access to Defendant Continental Casualty Company's Facility Evaluation guideline shall be limited to the parties and counsel of record u nless otherwise ordered by the Court; 2. Within thirty days after the completion of this litigation (including any appeals), Plaintiffs will return or destroy all copies of the Facility Evaluation guideline; 3. In the event the parties wish to file this document under seal, the parties shall follow the procedures set forth in Local Rules of Civil Procedure 5.6 and 5.7; 4. At the trial of this litigation or any hearing relating to this action before any judicial officer, if either party see ks to use this document it must give 7 days prior notice of such use to counsel for the other party to permit it the opportunity to seek appropriate protection from the Court. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/13/14. (LAD)
August 2, 2013 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Halimans' Motion to Remand, (Doc. 17 ), is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Haldimans' Second Application for Order to Show Cause Regarding Request for Preliminary Injunction, (Doc. 8 ), is DENIED. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/2/13. (LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haldiman et al v. Continental Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Lou Haldiman
Represented By: Frederick C Berry, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John B Haldiman, Jr.
Represented By: Frederick C Berry, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Continental Casualty Company
Represented By: Roopali H Desai(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Matthew J Caccamo(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Michael R Blankshain(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Keith Beauchamp(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Brent Robert Austin(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?