Automated Transactions LLC v. Giligins-Cabe & Cato Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
Giligins-Cabe & Cato Incorporated
Case Number:
2:2013cv00805
Filed:
April 22, 2013
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Sharon L Gleason
Nature of Suit:
Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action:
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Automated Transactions LLC v. Giligins-Cabe & Cato Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Giligins-Cabe & Cato Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Automated Transactions LLC | |
| Represented By: | John Murray |
| Represented By: | Albert L Jacobs, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Ray Kendall Harris |
| Represented By: | Gerard F Diebner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
