Blum et al v. Duran et al
| Nancy Blum and Edward Blum |
| Medamerica Mutual Risk Retention Group, Gary Sollars, Sara Shimmin, Scott L Dalton, Samuel Duran, Jr., California Emergency Physicians and Medical Protective Company |
| 2:2013cv00966 |
| May 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Personal Injury: Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 34 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 37 ) is dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/20/2014.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Medical Protective Company's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 15 ), is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Defendant Medical Protection Company from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant Medical Protection Company's Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Until Deadline for Filing Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 18 ), is granted. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/2/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
