Red Equipment Pte Limited v. BSE Tech LLC et al
| Red Equipment Pte Limited |
| BSE Tech LLC and Boston Semi Equipment LLC |
| 2:2013cv01003 |
| May 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX Outside US |
| H Russel Holland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER Red Equipment's motion for summary judgment 120 is granted. BSE' counterclaims are dismissed. Red Equipment's motion in limine 131 is granted. John Kleman is precluded from testifying in this matter. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 126 is denied. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 3/23/2016.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 34 Rooker and Lone Star's Motion to Dismiss, going forward, Rooker and Lone Star will be re-designated in the caption of this case as counterdefendants, rather than third-party defendants. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 9/18/14.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Red Equipment's motion 26 to dismiss Counts III and IV of BSE's counterclaim is granted. Counts III and IV of BSE's counterclaim are dismissed with prejudice. Red Equipment's request for attorney's fees is denied as premature. The issue of attorney's fees will be taken up when this case is fully resolved. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 6/6/2014.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
