Bolanos-Nunez v. USA
||May 28, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
||G Murray Snow
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
|Cause of Action:
||28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 24, 2015
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Willett's R&R (Doc. 30 ) is accepted. Petitioner's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Doc. 9 ) is dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Hearing and Dismiss (Doc. [2 9]) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and the Motion to Vacate (Doc. 24 ) in CR-12-00199-PHX-GMS and enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/23/15.(KGM)
|August 20, 2013
ORDER that the Clerk must serve a copy of the § 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in CV 13-1088-PHX-GMS-(LOA) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the § 2255 Motion. See PDF document for details. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/20/13. (LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?