Jordan v. Arpaio et al
| Cedric Ross Jordan |
| Jan Butcher, Joseph M Arpaio, Phoenix Police Department and Janice K Brewer |
| 2:2013cv01186 |
| June 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER - (1) The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 10 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third amended complaint in compliance with this Order. (2) If Plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (3) Plaintiff's Notice (Doc. 11 ) is denied as moot to the extent he is requesting that the Court place this case on the "fast-track." (4) Plaintiffs Notices of Status (Docs. 12 and 14 ) are granted in part, to the extent this Or der provides Plaintiff with the status of his case, and are denied in part as to any other relief Plaintiff may be requesting. (5) Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite Service of Complaint (Doc. 13 ) is denied as premature. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/15/14. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER - Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first ame nded complaint on Count 3 in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's Notice of Status (Doc. 5 ) is granted in part, to the extent this Order provides Plaintiff with the status of his case, and is denied in part as to any other relief Plaintiff may be requesting. Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite Service (Doc. 6 ) is denied as premature. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/16/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
