Briones v. USA
Petitioner: Riley Briones, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2013cv01240
Filed: June 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Bridget S Bade (PS)
Presiding Judge: Robert C Broomfield
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, the Clerk must file the lodged Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody and lodged Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees; Movant's Application to Procee d without Prepayment of Filing Fees 3 is denied as moot; Movant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody 2 is denied and the civil action opened in connection with this Mot ion is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly; Movant's Motion to Stay 1 is denied; the Clerk must send a copy of this Order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and to Plaintiff; the Clerk must indicate that t he Order relates to Ninth Circuit case 13-71056; in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable, re: CR 96-464-PHX-RCB. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 9/25/13. (REW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?