Valdespino v. Brewer et al
| Paul Thomas Valdespino |
| Unknown Wallace, E Jensen, Adam Bradley, Richard Allen Bock, Charles L Ryan and Janice K Brewer |
| 2:2013cv01528 |
| July 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| David G Campbell |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER that 10 the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying without prejudice 14 Amended Motion for TRO and Motion for Preliminary Injunction.. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/9/14.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and denying as moot 7 Plaintiff's Amended Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 4 Plainitt's Motion for TRO and denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk shall enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/18/13.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
