BioD LLC et al v. Amnio Technology LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 12, 2015
ORDER, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration 195 is granted; upon reconsideration, Plaintiffs' Counts 9-12 against Amnio Technology, Werber, and Pinnacle Transplant are reinstated as is Plaintiffs' Count 9 against Suddarth. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 1/12/15.(REW)
|August 6, 2014
ORDER, Plaintiffs' motion to compel 138 denied; Defendants' motion for a protective order 157 is granted; Plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling and planning order 150 is granted; fact discovery shall be completed by 12/31/14; as fact discovery proceeds, but not later than 12/1/14, the parties shall propose a calender for expert discovery and final motion practice (see order for complete details). Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 8/5/14. (REW)
|January 24, 2014
ORDER, Suddarth's motion to dismiss 48 is granted in part and denied in part; BioD's copyright infringement claim (Count One) and breach of loyalty and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims (Count Seven) are dismissed; Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims (Count Nine), aiding and abetting claims (Count Eleven) and conspiracy claims (Count Twelve) are dismissed; Suddarth's motion as to Counts 4, 5, and 6 is denied; Werber, Amnio Technology, and PTT's motion to dismiss 45 , 46 is granted in part and denied in part; BioD's tortious interference claim (Count Ten) is dismissed; Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims (Count Nine), aiding and abetting claims (Count Eleven), and c onspiracy claims (Count Twelve) are dismissed; Werber, Amnio Technology, and PTT's motion to dismiss as to Count 6 is denied; Plaintiffs are given leave to amend as to Count One only; Plaintiffs' second amended complaint, should they choose to file one, shall be filed by 2/13/14; Plaintiffs are not given leave to amend as to any of the other dismissed claims as amendment would be futile. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 1/24/14. (REW)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?