Thompson v. Burns et al
| Thad Jarvis Thompson |
| Unknown Williamson and Unknown Burns |
| 2:2013cv01715 |
| August 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| David G Campbell |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 is granted. Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. The Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintif f has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/3/2014. (ALS)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: Plaintiff has 30 days to file a notice stating whether he is an immigration detainee or convicted inmate. If Plaintiff fails to file the notice within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/2/2013. (ALS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
