Larsgard v. Corizon Health Incorporated

Plaintiff: John Kristoffer Larsgard
Defendant: Corizon Health Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2013cv01747
Filed: August 23, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 21, 2014 50 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendant Corizon's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and the motion is denied. Within 30 days from the date of this Order, Defendant Corizon may file a new summary judgment motion limited to the issues outlined in this Order. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/21/2014.(LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larsgard v. Corizon Health Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Health Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Kristoffer Larsgard
Represented By: Nemer Hadous(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?