Marroquin v. McDonald et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 31, 2015
ORDER, the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to this action; Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Court's June 19, 2014 Order 30 is denied; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 34 is granted; Plaintiff's Cross-M otion for Summary Judgment 42 is denied; Plaintiff's claims in Count Seven are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust; Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Court's September 12, 2014 Order 44 is denied; Plaintiff's Mot ion for an Order to Show, Temporary Restraining Order, and Preliminary Injunction 43 is denied; Defendants' Motion to Stay Dispositive Motion Deadline 55 is denied as moot; because no claim remains, this action is dismissed and the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/30/15. (REW)
|September 12, 2014
ORDER, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wilkinson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/11/14. (REW)
|June 19, 2014
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss is granted; Counts Two and Three against Ward and Hudson are dismissed as time-barred. Ward and Hudson are dismissed from this action. The remaining claims are Count Four against Wilkinson and Count Seven against Fernundez-Carr and Prince. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/2014.(LFIG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?