Flores v. Pinal County Sheriff's Office et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 9, 2014
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 6 ) is granted. The Court will accept the First Amended Complaint as timely filed. Plaintiff's failure to protect claim in the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Pinal County Sheriff's Office, Slinendoll, Youssef, and Young are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Agangan must answer the retaliation claim in First Amended Complaint. Defendant Agangan must answer the First Amended Complaint ( Doc. 10 ) or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/9/14. (LAD)
|November 26, 2013
ORDER - The Complaint (filed with the Notice of Removal at Doc. 1 ) is dismissed. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended comp laint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Defendants' August 28, 2013 Motion for Screening and Motion for Stay (Doc. 4 is denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/26/13. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?