Henderson v. Colvin
||Jeffrey Belden Henderson
||Carolyn W Colvin
||September 6, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Steven P Logan
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 23, 2018
ORDER granting 52 Plaintiff Jeffrey Belden Henderson's motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). Plaintiff is awarded $17,702.10 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. FURTHER ORDERED that this award shall be payable to Plaintiff and is subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 594 (2010). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 1/22/18. (EJA)
|July 13, 2017
ORDER vacating the Order and Judgment entered on March 25, 2015 and March 31, 2015 respectively (Docs. 38 , 39 ). ORDERED remanding this case to the Social Security Administration to calculate and award benefits. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. The judgment will serve as the mandate of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 7/12/17. (EJA)
|March 25, 2015
ORDER, reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 3/25/15. (REW)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?