Casteel #106031 v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
Petitioner: Everett Gregory Casteel
Respondent: Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of and Pinal, County of
Case Number: 2:2013cv01832
Filed: September 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: Bridget S Bade (PS)
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 *ORDER Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade ("R & R") (Doc. 26 ), recommending that this Court: grant Respondents' Motion to Transfer Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rul e 22-3 (Doc. 23 ); deny as moot Respondents' Motion to Stay the Time for Filing an Answer (Doc. 23); deny as moot Petitioner's Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 24 ) and his Motion to Stay (Doc. 25 ). R & R (Doc. 26 ) at 3:1-8. As the R & R allo wed, pro se Petitioner timely filed his objections (Docs. 27-28). After reviewing Petitioner's objections, the Court finds them to be without merit, especially in view of the R & R's sound reasoning. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING as an Order of this Court Magistrate Judge Bade's R & R (Doc. 26); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 7 ) is referred to the United States Co urt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3; and IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/2/2015. (KMG) *Modified to attach corrected PDF; NEF regenerated on 02/02/2015 (APJ) (CEI).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casteel #106031 v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Everett Gregory Casteel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pinal, County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?