Ross v. Arizona, State of

Ross v. Arizona, State of

Petitioner:	Jamonz Majerrious Ross
Respondent:	Arizona, State of
Case Number:	2:2013cv01845
Filed:	September 6, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Cochise
Presiding Judge:	Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2015	Filing 56 ORDER denying 54 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, Rule 59(e). See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/19/2015.(TLB)
April 8, 2015	Filing 50 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 ; the objections (Doc. 48 ) are overruled; the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal, with pre judice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/7/15. (LAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2015

Filing 56 ORDER denying 54 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, Rule 59(e). See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/19/2015.(TLB)

April 8, 2015

Filing 50 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 ; the objections (Doc. 48 ) are overruled; the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal, with pre judice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/7/15. (LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamonz Majerrious Ross
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?