Malone v. Colvin
||Carolyn W Colvin
||October 9, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||XX US, Outside State
||Lawrence O Anderson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 16, 2014
ORDER granting the parties' 37 Stipulation: EAJA fees are hereby awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of Three Thousand One Hundred Twelve Dollars and 76/100 ($3,112.76) subject to the terms of the parties' stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 5/16/2014. (KMG)
|March 25, 2014
ORDER granting 34 Unopposed Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration. The Commissioners decision denying Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits is hereby REVERSED and this Social Security appeal is REMANDED, pursuant to sent ence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings as set forth herein. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). On remand, an ALJ must (1) provide the substitute party an opportunity for a hearing; (2) determine whet her the claimant's impairments met or equaled the criteria of listings 1.02A and 1.03, providing sufficient rationale in support of the step three finding; and (3) further evaluate the claimant's mental impairments and reassess the claim ant's residual functional capacity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment in accordance with Rule 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., and the parties' briefing schedule is hereby vacated. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 3/25/14. (LAD)
|December 6, 2013
ORDER: On or before Wednesday, December 11, 2013, Defendant shall file the administrative record in this case as required by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Failure to comply with this Order will result in sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 12/6/2013. (ALS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?