Kloberdanz v. Arpaio et al
| Daniel L Kloberdanz |
| Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Arpaio, Joseph K Pellino, Unknown Pellino, Steven H Carpenter, Unknown Carpenter, Robert W Burghart, Unknown Burghart, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Denny Barney, Steve Chucri, Andy Kunasek, Clint Hickman, Mary Rose Wilcox, William Montgomery, Unknown Montgomery and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2013cv02182 |
| October 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John W Sedwick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
225
ORDER denying 221 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 1/1/17.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
222
ORDER denying 208 Motion for Court Review of Costs Judgment. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 12/6/16. (JWS)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting 121 Motion in Limine re: Nature of Plaintiff's Relationship with Prior Employee; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion in Limine re: Assertions of Self-Reporting Obligation to State Bar. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 5/24/16. (JWS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 1/28/14. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
