McCoy v. Ryan et al
Domonick Deshaun McCoy, Sr. |
Kimberly Currier, Unknown Atwood, R Allen Bock, Richard Pratt, Charles L Ryan and Unknown Party |
2:2013cv02232 |
October 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Steven P Logan (PS) |
David G Campbell |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filin g fee of $3.70. Counts One, Two, Four, Five, and Six are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Ryan, Pratt, Bock, Atwood, Currier, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2 are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the filing of th e date of this Order in which to discover by subpoena or otherwise the identity of Defendant John Doe #3 and to file a"notice of substitution" providing the Defendant's name in place of John Doe #3. The Clerk of Court must issue a subp oena in blank and send it to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment of dismissal for failure toprosecute without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file a "notice of substitution" of parties within 60 days from the filing date of this Order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/2/2013. (KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.