Vacaneri et al v. Ryles et al
Veronica Vacaneri and Joel Smith, Jr. |
Unknown Parties, Guadalupe, Town of, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Ryles and Tehran Ryles |
2:2013cv02262 |
November 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Paul G Rosenblatt |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER granting 24 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The civil rights claim set forth in the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed and Paragraph 26 is stricken. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/11/14.(LSP) |
Filing 18 ORDER that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 3 ) is granted as follows: (1) All state law claims asserted by Joel Smith Jr. against Deputy Ryles, Sheriff Arpaio, and the Town of Guadalupe are dismissed with prejudice. (2) All claims against M CSO are dismissed with prejudice. (3) All respondeat superior claims against Maricopa County are dismissed with prejudice. (4) All punitive damages claims alleged in Causes of Action One through Four are dismissed with prejudice. (5) All Monell offic ial capacity claims alleged in Cause of Action Five are dismissed, with leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED granting in part Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 11 ). Paragraphs 18, 24, 29, 36, and 39 are stricken. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Vacaneri may filed an amended complaint no later than April 11, 2014. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 3/21/2014.(KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.