Copeland #171877 v. Ryan et al
Alfred Copeland |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2013cv02278 |
November 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Paul G Rosenblatt |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the remaining portion of Ground 1 of the 1 Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictmentis DISMISSED. IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that the remaining portion of Ground 2 of the 1 Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictmentis DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/27/2020. (MSA) |
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is accepted and adopted in part and rejected in part (see document for further details). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grou nd 1 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED except to the extent Ground 1 raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ground 2 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED except to the extent Ground 2 raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ground 1 claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictment, and G round 2 claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictment, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings consistent with this Order, including the holding of an evidentiary hearing on Petitione rs claims of actual innocence on Count 3 and Count 6, and any other proceedings as deemed necessary and appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge shall appoint counsel to represent Petitioner if he qualifies for such appointment under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/29/15. (KGM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.