Copeland #171877 v. Ryan et al
Petitioner: Alfred Copeland
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2013cv02278
Filed: November 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the remaining portion of Ground 1 of the 1 Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictmentis DISMISSED. IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that the remaining portion of Ground 2 of the 1 Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictmentis DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/27/2020. (MSA)
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is accepted and adopted in part and rejected in part (see document for further details). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grou nd 1 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED except to the extent Ground 1 raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ground 2 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED except to the extent Ground 2 raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ground 1 claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 6 of the indictment, and G round 2 claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to Count 3 of the indictment, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings consistent with this Order, including the holding of an evidentiary hearing on Petitione rs claims of actual innocence on Count 3 and Count 6, and any other proceedings as deemed necessary and appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge shall appoint counsel to represent Petitioner if he qualifies for such appointment under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/29/15. (KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Copeland #171877 v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alfred Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?