Williams v. Arizona, State of et al
| Javon Tamar Williams |
| United States Department of the Treasury, Arizona, State of, United States Securities and Exchange Commission and NATO |
| 2:2013cv02306 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER that 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Expert is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/28/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER denying 14 Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Re-Open Case. FURTHER ORDERED denying the following motions filed by plaintiff: 21 , 22 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 41 , 42 , 43 . 44 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 and 50 . See attached Order for details. The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/24/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER that the Complaint and this action are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 2 Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and denying as moot 6 Motion to Seal Exhibit. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/13/14.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
